KANCHANA W/O SHARAVAN SHELLYAGOL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WPHC/100028/2025 · 2025-08-11
S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52831 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52831 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10030-DB WPHC No. 100028 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
W.P.H.C.NO.100028 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
KANCHANA W/O. SHARAVAN SHELLYAGOL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. GAVANAL, AT POST: KAMATNUR, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH B. MALLIGAWAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI.
3.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI.
4.
THE DEPUTY SUPRINTENDENT OF POLICE, GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE AN ORDER OR DIRECTION OR WRIT IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 TO PRODUCE THE DETAINEE HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER BY NAME SHARAVAN S/O. LAXMAN SHELLYAGOL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O.GAVANAL, AT POST KAMATNUR, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI WHO HAS BEEN
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10030-DB WPHC No. 100028 of 2025
DETAINED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 5 FROM 23.06.2025, BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw this petition. The memo reads as under:
“The counsel for the petitioner most humbly submits as under: In the above top noted petition the prayer sought in the petition does not survive for
consideration as became infructuous. Because the detainee already released from the detention today afternoon 12:00 PM. Hence petition may be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice and equity.”
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10030-DB WPHC No. 100028 of 2025
In view of the said memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE
RKM /CT-AN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1