SMT. SHOBHA ISHWAR PALEKAR v. THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
WP/104571/2023 · 2025-09-25
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52830 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52830 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13301 WP No. 104571 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 104571 OF 2023 (S-PRO) BETWEEN:
SMT. SHOBHA ISHWAR PALEKAR AGE-56 YEARS, OCC-JUNIOR OFFICE ASSISTANT, OFFICE OF THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, KARNATAKA CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,. KUMTA DIVISION, HEGDE ROAD, NEAR INDUTRIAL AREA, KUMTA, DIST-UTTAR KANNADA-581343. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K.S. KORISHETTAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE UNDER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, FISHERIES AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001.
2.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., ABBAKKA NAGAR , 1ST MAIN ROAD, KOTTAR, MANGULURU-575006. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P,N. HATTI, HCGP)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO, ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO. 2 TO RECONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED. 18/04/2023 VIDE
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13301 WP No. 104571 of 2023
ANNEXURE-M SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2, AND TO GIVE HER THE PROMOTION AS PER HER SENIORITY IN SERVICE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PROMOTE THE PETITIONER AS OFFICE MANAGER AS PER THE SERVICE EXPERIENCE ANS SENIORITY OF THE PETITIONER, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND TO QUASH THE LETTER VIDE NO. (KCDC/E4/SIBBANDIMUMBHADTHI/2023-24/66) DATED. 02/05/2023 ANNEXUERE-N, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 2.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 08.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SH Ct-cmu List No.: 2 Sl No.: 30