APHC010628062023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32358/2023 Between: 1. P. VARALAKSHMI,, W/O. P. VENKARA RAMANA REDDY, AGED 37, R/O. CHENNAMPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SI, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. THE HEAD CONSTABLE, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 6. MUNEER AHAMAD, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. WORKING AS S.I OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 7. PANDU FULL NAME NOT KNOWN, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, WORKING AS HEAD CONSTABLE, ANANTHAPURAMU RURAL POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 to 7 in calling the petitioner to attend the police station and insisting the petitioner to cancel the sale deed registered vide Document No. 8846 of 2022 dated 15- 07-2022 and further insisting the petitioner to withdraw the suit in O.S. No. 1879 of 2023 on the file of the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu and interfering in civil disputes of the petitioner as the same is illegal, contrary to law, arbitraiy and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents 4 to 7 not to interfere in the civil disputes and the private property of the petitioner admeasuring an extent of Ac 0.16 Cents situated in Sy.No. 31/1 or Plot Nos. 228, 229, 244 and 245 of Papampeta Village, Narayanapuram Panchayat limits, Ananthapuram District to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 4 to 7 not to interfere into the civil disputes of the petitioner, at the instance of the third parties and not to call the petitioner to the Ananthapuramu Rural police station, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32358 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 to 7 in calling the petitioner to attend the police station and insisting the petitioner to cancel the sale deed registered vide Document No. 8846 of 2022 dated 15-07-2022 and further insisting the petitioner to withdraw the suit in O.S. No. 1879 of 2023 on the file of the Honourable Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ananthapuramu and interfering in civil disputes of the petitioner as the same is illegal, contrary to law, arbitraiy and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents 4 to 7 not to interfere in the civil disputes and the private property of the petitioner admeasuring an extent of Ac 0.16 Cents situated in Sy.No. 31/1 or Plot Nos. 228, 229, 244 and 245 of Papampeta Village, Narayanapuram Panchayat limits, Ananthapuram District to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri P. Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are calling the petitioner to the police station, in the absence of any crime registered and interfering with the civil disputes in between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. Learned counsel would further submit that a direction may be given to the police. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioners to the police station since no crime has been registered against the petitioner and not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32358 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 104