HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14866 of 2025 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE DR. GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J. 1. Heard Sri Deepak Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the incident is alleged to have taken place on 07.12.2024 whereas the F.I.R. has been lodged on 26.12.2024 without there being any plausible explanation of such an inordinate delay. He further submits that the informant alleged that he met with the applicant through grinder dating app, who took him to Sharda L.G. place,where three-four accused were also present and they all took him towards the railway track and had committing maarpeet with him, thereafter asked his UPI PIN and got transferred Rs. 99,733/- in different bank accounts. Learned counsel argued that no amount has been transferred in the account of the applicant and that there is no medical report to demonstrate that the informant has sustained any injury. He further submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 04.04.2025. 3. Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that in case the applicant is released on bail he will misuse the liberty of bail. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Upadhyay, Manish Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Prince Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant Prince Kumar be released on bail in Case Crime No. 281 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 309(4) B.N.S., Police Station Knowledge Park, District Gautambudh Nagar on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant in accordance with law. October 6, 2025 S.Ali BAIL No. 14866 of 2025 2 (Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad