THE MANAGING DIRECTOR v. SIDDAPUR DISTILLERIES LIMITED
WA/100238/2024 · 2025-01-21
B M Shyam Prasad, Ramachandra D Huddar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5281 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5281 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:987-DB WA No. 100238 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT APPEAL NO. 100238 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, INDIAN OIL BHAVAN, G-9, ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA-400051, REP. BY IT’S SENIOR DEPOT MANAGER, SRI. R. SANAL. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. C.V. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SIDDAPUR DISTILLERIES LIMITED, TALUK JAMKHANDI, BAGALKOT DISTRICT, KARNATAKA 591317 (REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR) DHARMALINGAYYA GUDAGUNTI
2.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DHARMALINGAYYA GUDAGUNTI, AGED 42 YEARS, M/S. SIDDAPUR DISTILLERIES LIMITED, TALUK JAMKHANDI, BAGALKOT DISTRICT, KARNATAKA 591317.
3.
THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE JOINT SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION, (DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION) KRISHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI 110001.
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:987-DB WA No. 100238 of 2024
4.
DIRECTOR (SUGAR), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION, DIRECTORATE OF SUGAR AND VEGETABLE OILS, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 110001.
5.
THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GASES SHASTRI BHAVAN, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD MARG, NEW DELHI 110001.
6.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, BHARAT BHAVAN, 4 AND 6 CURRIMBHOY ROAD, BELLARD ESTATE, MUMBAI 400001.
7.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, PETROLEUM HOUSE, 17, JAMSHEDJI TATA ROAD, MUMBAI,-MAHARASHTRA 400020. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO, ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED. 25-04-2024 PASSED IN W.P. NO.100979/2024(GM-RES) & ETC.,
THIS WRIT APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:987-DB WA No. 100238 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD)
Sri. C.V. Angadi, the learned counsel for the appellant, submits that in similar circumstances the appellant’s request for dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn is accepted and this Court has disposed of such appeals accordingly, and that even in the present case the request for withdrawal is for the same reasons. This Court’s order dated 07.01.2025 in W.A. No.100240/2024 reads as under:
“Sri C.V. Angadi, the learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the present appeal is filed as against the common order dated 25.04.2024 in a series of writ petitions [including W.P. No.100743/2024]; that the appellant is aggrieved by certain directions issued by the writ court, but the tender period has expired; that the appellant has initiated fresh tender process and therefore the memo is filed for withdrawal. Taking these submissions on record, the writ appeal stands
disposed of.”
In the light of the afore, the appeal stands disposed of on similar terms.
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:987-DB WA No. 100238 of 2024
In view of the disposal of the appeal, all pending applications do not survive for consideration and stand
disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- (B.M.SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE
RSH, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 31