IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THbUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 15564 OF 2020 Between: Smt. Sayeda Sakina Begum, W/o. Late Yezad Hussain, aged about 72 years, r/o. Mutumaiah Street, Banaganapalle Town and Mandal, Kumool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist. The District Collector, Kurnool District at Kurnool. The Tahsildar, Banaganapalle Mandal, at Banaganapalle , Kurnool District. 2. 3. 4. The Mandal Surveyor, Banaganapelle Mandal, Banaganapalle, Kurnool District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac. 1.75 cts in S. No. 162/1A/2 on the bank of Zureru Vagu of Banganapalli d> village and Mandal, Kurnool District wi this Honble Court dated 13.7.2020 without complying with the orders of as made in WP No. 10892/2020 and trying to create third party interests in the said iand by granting pattas to third parties by dispossessing the petitioner from the said land as illegal and 21 of the Constitution of India respondents from arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and creating any third party pattas to third parties. consequently forbear the interests in the aforesaid land by granting jA NO: 1 OF ?n?n Petition under Section 151 stated in the affidavit filed i CPC praying that in the circumstances of the petition, the High Court may be P sed to drrect the respondents not to create any third party interests by 9 anting pattas to third parties in the iand to an extent of Ac. 1.75 cts. in Mandai, Kurnooi District by dispossessing the petitioner or otherwise. SRI. B SIVA KESAVA REDDY Counsel for the Petitioner- Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: GP FOR REVENUE APHC010236282020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 15564/2020 Between: Smt. Sayeda Sakina Begum ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT{S) The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.B SIVA KESAVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2 TCDS.J W.P. No. 15564 of 2020 The Court made the following order: 1. It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the writ petition does not inasmuch as representation made by the petitioner was rejected by the 4‘^ respondent and questioning the survive same petitioner preferred writ petition vide W.P.No. 16768 of 2020 and the same is pending adjudication. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. as As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- U.SR! DEVI assistant registrar fFlCER //TRUE COPY// SECT! To, 1. One CC to Sri. B Siva Kesava Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies GSC * 9 HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.15564 of 2020 5 ??Sf^20?5 g ^ . Current becuon ^ ^// DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS