AT CHANDIGARH 108 CR No.2684 of 2025 Date of Decision: 03.05.2025 Pooja ..... Petitioner Versus Rawal Singh (since deceased) through his LR ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Shubham Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J (ORAL) 1. This is a civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 12.03.2025, whereby, the application filed by the petitioner for amendment of written statement, has been declined. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the primary reason for filing the amendment application was to plead the aspect of the plaintiff having transferred the suit property in favour of Tirath Singh, which fact is apparent from Ex.P-10 i.e. transferred deed dated 15.04.2019, which had been produced by the plaintiff himself. It has been submitted that since in the impugned order, it had been observed by the trial Court that in case the Court finds that no relief is to be given in favour of the plaintiff, the appropriate order would be passed after hearing both the parties, thus, the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to raise all pleas as are available to her at the time of final arguments. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS BAHL) 03.05.2025 JUDGE D.Bansal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH BANSAL 2025.05.03 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh