Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52797 (AP)

Smt. M. Kanakamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/22928/2024 · 2025-10-28

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010443712024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 22928/2024 Between: 1. SMT. M. KANAKAMMA, , S/O M. VISWANADHA NAIDU. AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O MEDUWADA VILLAGE, S.R. PURAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT ), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( FINANCE DEPARTMENT ), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF IRRIGATION, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA . CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, CHITTOOR CENTRAL DIVISION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. THE CHAIRMAN, COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ( CFMS ) STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA. 2 VS, J W.P.22928 of 2024 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing and not crediting the amounts even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the execution of works under the schem of Neeru Chettu i.e., Agreement No.209DN/2017-18, dt.07.06.2017 bill for the amount of Rs.2,38,875/- (two lacks eighty eight thousends seventy five rupees only) as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice, Violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Official Respondents to pay an amount due to the petitioner in respect of execution of afore mentioned works forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith release the bill amounts to the petitioner in relation to the execution of works i.e.. Agreement NO.209DN/2017-18, dt.07.06.2017 bill for the amount of Rs.2,38,875/- (two lacks eighty eight thousands seventy five rupees only) pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PASAPALA SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 VS, J W.P.22928 of 2024 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.P.Pardha Saradhi, learned counsel representing Mr.Pasapala Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further cause survives in this matter and that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 29.10.2025 KGR