Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5279 (MAD)

Selvaraj v. Anushiya

CMP(MD)/19477/2025 · 2026-03-17

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NO. 19477 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CMP(MD) NO. 19477 of 2025 IN SA(MD) SR NO. 58199 OF 2023 1. Selvaraj S/o. Nagarajan Utthayagoundanpatti Pachamalayankottai Nilakkottai Taluk Dindigul District. 2. SUBRAMANI S/o. Nagarajan Utthayagoundanpatti Pachamalayankottai Nilakkottai Taluk Dindigul District. 3. MUTHAMMAL W/o. Nagarajan Utthayagoundanpatti Pachamalayankottai Nilakkottai Taluk Dindigul District. 4. NAGARAJAN S/o. Late. Utthappa Gounder Utthayagoundanpatti Pachamalayankottai Nilakkottai Taluk Dindigul District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5. MUTHURAJ S/o. Late. Utthappa Gounder Utthayagoundanpatti Pachamalayankottai Nilakkottai Taluk Dindigul District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Anushiya W/o. Late. Lakkanan Door No.3/301 Kendichampatti Seevalsaragu Village Dindigul Taluk Dindigul District. 2. Natarajan S/o. Nagarajan Utthayagoundanpatti Pachamalayankottai Nilakkottai Taluk Dindigul District. 3. The Thasildar Nilakkottai Taluk Nilakkottai Town Dindigul District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): R.R.Kannan M.Sivakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Thangapandian for R1 No appearance for R2 Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, AGP for R3 Prayer: To Condone the delay of 832 days in re presenting the Second Appeal in SA(MD) SR No.58199 of 2023 and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ORDER The delay of 832 days in re-presenting the Second Appeal papers is sought to be condoned. 2.I have heard Mr.R.R.Kannan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Thangapandian, learned Counsel for the contesting first respondent. 3.Learned Counsel for the petitioner stated that the delay occasioned only on account of the learned Counsel having shifted the office twice. Meantime, the papers got misplaced and hence, delay occasioned. 4.Though delayed counter affidavit has been filed by the contesting respondent that the delay is unexplained and inordinate, I am satisfied with the reasons assigned for the delay in re-presenting the Second Appeal. At the same time, in order to compensate the prejudice caused to the first respondent, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed on payment of Rs.2,000/- to the learned Counsel for the first respondent within a period of one [1] week. 5.Post on 24.03.2026, “for reporting compliance”. 17-03-2026 MR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis To 1. Anushiya W/o. Late. Lakkanan Door No.3/301 Kendichampatti Seevalsaragu Village Dindigul Taluk Dindigul District. 2. Natarajan S/o. Nagarajan Utthayagoundanpatti Pachamalayankottai Nilakkottai Taluk Dindigul District. 3. The Thasildar Nilakkottai Taluk Nilakkottai Town Dindigul District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis