Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 52789 (BOM)
VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THR. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. TEJRAM S/O MAHADEO DANGORE AND OTHERS
CAF/2555/2025 · 2025-09-08
Shri Pravin S Patil
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52789 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52789 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 11.caf.2554.2025 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 2554 AND 2555 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.865 OF 2015 VIDC ..vs.. Tejram s/o Mahadeo Dangore and ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri J.B. Kasat, Advocate for the appellant. Shri S. Joshi, Assistant Government Pleader for the State. Shri C.R. Najbile, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 to 8.
CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
DATED : 08/09/2025. Heard.
2. By these applications, the applicants are seeking condonation of delay in filing the application for setting aside the abatement against respondent nos. 1 and 8 and bringing their legal representatives on record.
3. Since the reasons put forth in the applications being not controverted, the applications are allowed. Delay stands condoned. The abatement is hereby quashed and set aside.
4. The applications are disposed of accordingly.
5. Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks. Amended copy be supplied on other side.
(PRAVIN S. PATIL
, J. ) Trupti