Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52786 (ALL)

NAHAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/13999/2025 · 2025-05-05

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:71954 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13999 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nahar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shekhar Gangal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 to 3 and perused the record. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not to be issued to respondent no.4. 3. The petitioner is a complainant, who made the complaint against the Ex-Gram Pradhan Hari Singh/respondent no.4 along-with an affidavit before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Mathura on 05.07.2024. On the basis of aforesaid complaint Enquiry Officer was appointed by the respondent no.2 vide its order dated 19.07.2024. 4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable time has lapsed but till date no decision has been taken on the same. 5. On the other hand it is argued by learned Standing Counsel that the decision will be taken by the authority concerned expeditiously. 6. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage itself. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to take a decision in the matter strictly in accordance with law most expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and in view of the procedure prescribed under U.P. Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhan and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Pramod Tripathi Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad