Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52776 (AP)

V. BHASKARA RAO v. GOVT OF A.P., REP BY PRL. SECY & 2 OTHERS

WP/14346/2005 · 2025-04-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY. THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14346 OF 2005 Between: V. Bhaskara Rao, S/o. Late Appalaswamy, aged 43 years, Occ. Lecturer R/o Alwar Veedhi, Bobbili, Vizianagaram District ...Petitioner AND 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal S^cret^ry U'g^ Education (CE.II.1) Department Secretariat, Hyderabad ” 2. The Director of Collegiate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 3. Rajaiah R.S.R.K. Ranga^o College, Bobbili, Vizianagaram District rep by Correspondent ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue any Appropriate Writ, order or direction preferably a writ in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to Memo NO. SP1062/CE.II.1/2004r3 dt 25-l:-2005 on the file of the 1st respondent and to quash the saitie as being illegal, arbitrary, volative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently suspend the operation of the said Memo by permitting the petitioner to conti Botany in the 3rd respondent college may to act as a Lecturer in LA. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 18225 OF 2005) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court pleased suspend the operation of:the Memo No. SP 10162/CE.II.1/2 004-03 dt 25-4-2005 issued by the 1st respondent by permitting the petitioner act as Lecturer in Botany in the 3r4 respondent college ^ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B MANJULATHA VEDAVALLY (Not Present) ' Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: Order may be to APHC010156022005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] \ / THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14346/2005 Between: V. Bhaskara Rao ...PETITIONER AND Govt Of A P Rep By Pri Secy 2 Others and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: DC ... i \ L.SPONDEiNT(3) 1. B MANJULATHA VEDAVALLY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.04.2025 and 24.04.2025. there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal today, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for shall be no order as to costs. non-prosecution. There As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. I Sd/- K.J. RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //true copy// To, SECTION OFFICER 1- OneCCtoSRr Pradesh [OUTf^ HIGHER EDUCATION 3. Three CD Copies BMANJUUTHAVEDAVALLYAdvocate fOPUCJ > High Court of Andhra sree HIGH COURT DATED: 01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.14346 of 2005 DISMISSING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS