APHC010336572021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 20384/2021 Between: 1. APEX FROZEN FOODS LTD, 3-160, PANASAPADU, KAKINADA-533005. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA-533001. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, KAKINADA. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIMMAPURAM P.S. TIMMAPURAM-533428. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARAPA P.S. KARAPA- 533462. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. CHIKKALA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O.SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 45 YRS. HINDU, R/O.H.NO.2-22, SIRIPURAM (V). KARAPA MANDAL. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 in not acting upon the complaint of the petitioner Dt.02-09-2021 and not taking action against the mob attacks/rioting towards the petitioners staff, machinary etc. and thereby causing danger to the lifes of the staff members of the petitioner company and damage to its valuable property and machinary as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural 2 justice and consequently order directing the respondents 2 to 5 to see that normal working situation prevails without there being any mob attacks or rioting towards the petitioners employees and their property from the hands of the mob rowdy elements gathered by the 6th respondent and grant such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. V SAI KUMAR 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the subject matter does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 20384 of 2021 06.10.2025 Mjl/*