Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5277 (UTT)

MOHD GALIB HASSAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1113/2025 · 2025-05-01

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS 1113/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Siddhartha Singh Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. S.K. Nailwal, Standing Counsel, for the State. (2) Proceedings under Arms Act were initiated against the petitioner for cancellation of his gun licence, as a criminal case under Section 302 IPC was pending against him. According to petitioner, he was acquitted by the Trial Court, however, in the meantime, proceedings initiated against him under the Arms Act was dismissed on account of his failure to appear before the District Magistrate on a particular date. According to petitioner, he made an application for restoration of the proceedings, which is not being decided. (3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that District Magistrate be directed to expedite disposal of the restoration application. (4) Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate concerned to consider and decide petitioner’s restoration application within six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 1.5.2025 Pr