Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010043472017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4546/2017 (Petition Under Article 227 of Constitution of India aggrieved by the order dated 13-04-2017 in lA.No. 105 of 2017 in MVOP No. 199/2013 on the file of the Court of the Vlth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Markapuram, Prakasam District.) BETWEEN: \ 1 .Bijjam Anjanadevi W/o Late Parameswara Reddy, aged about 24 years, 2.Bijjam Rama Kirthana D/o Late Parameswara Reddy', aged about 7 years, 3.Bijjam Parameswasri D/o Late Parameswara Reddy, aged about 4 years, (Petitioners 2 and'3 Being Minors rep by their mother petitioenr natural guardian.) • ' 4,Bijjam Bhupal Reddy S/o Rami Reddy, aged about 51 years, S.Bijjam Mahalakshmamma W/o Bhupalreddy, aged about 48 years. All are R/o Pothurajupalem village, Ongole Mandal,-Prakasam District. ‘ • ... ..Petitioners/ Petitioners/Claimants. AND l.Bodipally Ramaiah S/o Chenchu Ramaiah, aged about 41 years, R/o.Viswanathapuram, Podili town, Prakasam District. 2.Anl<;aluiSrinivasula Reddy S/o Venkata Subba Reddyi aged.about 43 years, R/o Thellapadu village, Donakohda Mandal, Prakasam District. 3.The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd. Birudharaju Towers, Trunk Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. .. .Respondents/ Respondents /Respondents.
CRPMP 5950 OF 2017: Petition Under section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in M.V.O.P. No. 199 of 2013 on the fiie of the VI Additionai District & Sessions Judge, Markapur, Prakasam District. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
SRI.MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SRINIVASA RAO VUTLA
2. The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010043472017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4546/2017 Between: ■bijjam Anjanadevi and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Bodipally Ramaiah and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SRINIVASA RAO VUTLA ...RESPONDENT(S)
2. The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION N0.4546 of 2017
ORDER: The present Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the
Order dated 13.04.2017 in l.A.No.105 of 2017 in M.V.O.P.No.199 of 2013 passed by the VI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Markapur, Prakasam District.
1.
2. At the time of hearing, it is represented by Sri Madhava Rao Nalluri that no further orders need to be passed as the CRP has been rendered infructuous.
3. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A VENUGOPALA RAO assistant REGISTRAR ‘k- SECTION OFFICER Additional District and Sessions Judge, Markapuram, \ TRUE COPY \
1. TheVlth Prakasam District.
2 One CC to Mr. MADHAVARAO. N. Advocate [OPUC]
3. one CC to Mr. SRINIVASA RAO, V. Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two C.D.Copies nm
high court DATED:23/06/2025
ORDER:- CRP. No. 4546 of 2017 dismissing the crp AS INFRUCTI US C3