MRK,J WP.No.20715 of 2017 APHC010083662017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 20715 OF 2017 Between: 1. A.VENKATESHWAR RAO, ELURU, S/o. Hanumanth Rao Age: 55 yrs, Occ: Home Guard, West Godavari District, Eluru. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP 2 OTHERS, Rep. by Principal Secretary Depart of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, AP State. 2. The Superintendent of Police, West Godavari District, Eluru, 3. The Reserve Inspector Home Guard, organization West Godavari Region, Eluru ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by directing the Respondents to continue petitioner services as Home Guard by declaring the action of the respondents in not permitting petitioner to continue as Home Guard as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 25417 OF 2017 MRK,J WP.No.20715 of 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit petitioner to attend Home Guard duty pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: I MAAMU VANI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR SERVICES I (TG) MRK,J WP.No.20715 of 2017 The Court made the following ORDER: 1. On 29.10.2025, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner(s). List the matter on 31.10.2025 under the caption 'for dismissal.” 2. On 31.10.2025, this Court passed the following order: “On 29.10.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner(s). Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner(s). List the matter next week under the same caption 'for dismissal'..” 3. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 4. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 07.11.2025 Dvs MRK,J WP.No.20715 of 2017 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM 63 WRIT PETITION No.20715 of 2017 Date: 07.11.2025 Dvs