Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52766 (MAD)

SENNIAPPAN v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WP/15296/2025 · 2025-04-28

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.15296 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.15296 of 2025 Senniappan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Erode – Post & District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sathyamangalam – Post, Erode – District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Bangalapudhur Police Station, Bangalapudhur Post, Erode District. 4. Thangavel 5. Eswaran 6. Murugesan 7. Rani 8. Andamuthu 9. Sellappan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to provide police protection to remove the pipeline from the petitioner's p. 2 W.P.No.15296 of 2025 land situated in Survey No.34/1 to an extent of 0.73 acre of Kongarpalayam Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District, based on the representation dated 10.02.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Veerasekaran For Respondents For R1 to R3 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This writ petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to provide police protection to remove the pipeline from the petitioner's land. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he owned property comprised in Survey No.34/1 to an extent of 0.73 acre situated at Kongarpalayam Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk, Erode District. Without his knowledge, the respondents 4 to 9 have laid pipeline to draw water to their land. Hence, the petitioner seeks adequate police protection to remove the pipeline. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and p. 3 W.P.No.15296 of 2025 perused the materials placed before this Court. 4. On perusal of the records, it is revealed that on the permission granted by the revenue authorities, the respondents 4 to 9 had laid the pipeline. If any grievances over the said order, the petition has to approach the civil Court for appropriate relief. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this writ petition cannot be granted and the writ petition itself is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 28.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order rts p. 4 W.P.No.15296 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. rts To 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Erode – Post & District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sathyamangalam – Post, Erode – District. 3. The Inspector of Police, Bangalapudhur Police Station, Bangalapudhur Post, Erode District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. W.P.No.15296 of 2025 28.04.2025