Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52753 (CHH)

M/S SHREE SHYAM AGRO PRODUCTS (REGISTRATION) v. SMT. REENA BABASAHEB KANGALE

CONT/1560/2025 · 2025-10-14

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51314 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1560 of 2025 M/s Shree Shyam Agro Products (Registration) Village Labji, Tehsil Ambikapur, Through Its Proprietor- Jayshankar Sahu, S/o Shri Laxman Sahu, Abed About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 48, Manipur, Near Bilaspur Chowk, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Smt. Reena Babasaheb Kangale Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Protection, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Kiran Kaushal Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation Limited, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Arun Kumar Vishwakarma District Marketing Officer, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing, Federation Limited, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shivendra Bahadur Kamte Food Officer, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Anuja Sharma, on behalf of Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocates For Respondents : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 15.10.2025 1. In pursuance of direction given by this Court, Mr. Arun Kumar Vishwakarma, District Marketing Officer, Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Association Limited, Ambikapur, District Surguja is present before this Court. BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.10.16 11:22:16 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order dated 23.07.2025 passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP(C) No. 3522 of 2025 has already been complied with and the respondents have tendered unconditional apology for delay in compliance of the order passed by this Court. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the respondents that they have already complied with the order passed by this Court and also considering the unconditional apology tendered by them in delayed compliance of the order passed by this Court, nothing is required to be adjudicated by this Court at this stage, therefore, the Contempt proceeding initiated against the respondents is closed. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika