Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5275 (RAJ)

VIVEK LODHA S/O KAMAL CHND LODHA v. ANOOP KHARBANDA, S/O LT. AMARNATH KHARBANDA

CW/2199/2025 · 2025-02-14

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6597] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2199/2025 1. Vivek Lodha S/o Kamal Chnd Lodha, Aged 42 Years, Resident Of B-14B- Govind Marg, Behind Raj Khuran Hospital Adarsh Nagar Jaipur Also At M/s Rishabh Sweets, Shop No. 440/441 Behind Reliance Fresh Store Gali No. 1 Rajapark Jaipur 2. Vikas Lodha S/o Kamal Chnd Lodha, Aged 40 Years, Resident Of B-14B- Govind Marg, Behind Raj Khuran Hospital Adarsh Nagar Jaipur Also At M/s Rishabh Sweets, Shop No. 440/441 Behind Reliance Fresh Store Gali No. 1 Rajapark Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus Anoop Kharbanda, S/o Lt. Amarnath Kharbanda, Aged About 36 Years, R/o House No. 344, Gali No. 1, Main Circle, Rajapark Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Awasthi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 14/02/2025 This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties: 1. The order dated 21.09.2024 and the order dated 03.01.2025 passed by learned Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I (for brevity, "the learned Rent Tribunal") in original Application No.167/24 are quashed and set aside. [2025:RJ-JP:6597] (2 of 2) [CW-2199/2025] 2. The petitioners are granted only one opportunity to file reply either on the next date fixed before the learned Rent Tribunal or within a period of two weeks thereafter, if learned Rent Tribunal so directs subject to payment of a cost of Rs.15,000 by them to the respondent in the shape of a demand draft/banker cheque drawn in his favour. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/30