APHC010338282022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20299/2022 Between: 1. B.SRIKANTH REDDY,, S/O.B.VENKATA RAMI REDDY, AGE-39 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE JOB, R/O.EDDULAPALLI ROAD, PAMIDI TOWN, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BANAGANAPALLI TOWN POLICE STATION, BANAGANAPALLI, KURNOOL DISTRICT (NANDYALA DISTRICT) 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BANAGANAPALLITOWN POLICE STATION, BANAGANAPALLI, KURNOOL DISTRICT (NANDYALA DISTRICT). 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAMIDI POLICE STATION, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not registering the FIR on the complaint made by the 2 petitioner on 2-4-2022 in On-line Spandana vide No.ATP20220402149 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 5threspondent police to register the complaint dt- 02-04-2022 made by the petitioner for conducting necessary investigation as per law in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SREEMANNARAYANA VATTIKUTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not registering the FIR on the complaint made by the petitioner on 2-4- 2022 in On-line Spandana vide No.ATP20220402149 as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently, to direct the 5th respondent police to register the complaint dt-02-04-2022 made by the petitioner for conducting necessary investigation as per law in the interest of justice and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that immediately after receipt of Spandana Petition, the Investigation Officer called the Petitioner to the Police Station and enquired him, wherein, he stated that there are disputes between him and his wife. Since the matter relates to family disputes, no crime is registered basing on the complaint of the Petitioner and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*