APHC010681922012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 293/2012 Between: 1. IRUKUNDENNELA KOTESWARA RAO & ANR, S/O. VENKATESWARLU R/O. ACHACHAMMAPALEM H/O. PETLURIVARIPALEM NARSARAOPET MANDAL, 2. IRUKUNDENNELA ANJAMMA, W/O. KOTESWARA RAO R/O. ACHACHAMMAPALEM H/O. PETLURIVARIPALEM NARSARAOPET MANDAL, ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. M HANUMAIAH ANR, S/O. VENKATA NARASIAH OWNER OF TRACTOR BEARING NO.AP-7L-0190 R/O. YELLAMANDA VILLAGE NARASARAOPET MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER 15TH LINE, MAIN ROAD ARUNDALPET GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased toset aside the Judgment and decree passed in MVOP No. 1020 of 2005 on the file of the Chairman, MACT cum I Additional district Judge at Guntur dated 5.3.2007 and enhance the compensation upto Rs,1,40,600/- together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing the main O.P. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(MACMAMP 300 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 72 days in filing CMA against the Judgment and decree passed in MVOP No. 1020 of 2005 on the file of the Chairman, MACT cum I Additional district Judge at Guntur dated 5.3.2007. Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. VENKATESWARLU POSANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . 2. Dr CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 JUDGMENT:- On 13.02.2025, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants sought time to file a vakalatnama. 2. On 20.06.2025, 18.07.2025, 01.08.2025, 30.08.2025, 19.09.2025, 17.10.2025 there was no representation for the appellants/claimants. 3. Today i.e., on 07.11.2025, there is also no representation for the appellants/claimants. 4. Considering the conduct of appellants, this appeal is fit to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Accordingly, this MACMA is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J 07.11.2025 LSP/ABP 4 96 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 293/2012 07.11.2025 LSP/ABP