1 2025:CGHC:55067-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 509 of 2025 Karan Ratre S/o Remray Ratre Aged About 25 Years R/o Madhuban P.S.- Sarangarh, District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department of Home (Jail), Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. District Magistrate Sarangarh Bilaigarh, District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3. Superintendent of Jail Central Jail Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shivang Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 12.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. Shivang Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the respondents/State. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.11.13 10:28:33 +0530 2 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 02.07.2025 (Annexure P/1) passed by the District Magistrate, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh; 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to release of the petitioner on parole; 10.3 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s) that it deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity, in favour of the petitioner;” 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking release on parole. It is submitted that the connected Criminal Appeal No. 213 of 2025 was heard finally with the consent of the parties, and vide order dated 12.11.2025, this Court has acquitted the petitioner in the said appeal. In view of the aforesaid development, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw the present petition. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to the said prayer. 5. Accordingly, in view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan