1 APHC010593112025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30608/2025 Between: 1. SMT.AKUIA SUBBA LAKSHMI, S/O.G.GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O.H.NO. 1-370, NANDAVARAM VILLAGE, BANAGANAPALLE MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II-TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. BANDARU VENKATESWARAMMA, W/O.LATE BANDARU LAXMANNA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC HEAD CONSTABLE, II-TOWN POLICE STATION, NANDYAL, R/0.28-852-AB1A, NEAR CPM OFFICE, NGOS COLONY, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondent No.3 in interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.4 and compelling the Petitioner and her husband Akula Chandra Shekar to comply with the illegal demands of the Respondent No.4 without following due process of law even 2 in spite of the said demands are civil in nature and the Police should not interfere with the civil disputes as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 not to disturb the personal liberty of the Petitioner and her husband Akula Chandra Shekar by interfering in the civil disputes pending between the Petitioner and the Respondent No.4 without following due process of law in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint made by respondent No. 4, the police called the petitioner and her husband to the police station for enquiry, and no crime has been registered. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 05.11.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30608 of 2025 Dt..05.11.2025 ASR