APHC010231942022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13607/2022 Between: 1. KONTHAM RAMESH,, S/O.YADAGIRI, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 1-3-109/2, SIVASAI NILAYAM, GEETHANAGAR, JANAGAM- 506167. (REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER, RAVIPATIVEERANJANEYALU, S/O. RAMACHANDRA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1-31-22/1, YEDLAVALLIVARI VEEDHI, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.) ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM URBAN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. CHADALAWADA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. RAJENDRA PRASAD, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, C/O. POLLUPATISUBRAHMANYAM, CETTINPETA, BESIDE KUNCHUMAMBA TEMPLE, BHEEMUNIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 in interfering with the matters of civil disputes between 5th respondent and me pertaining to land to an extent of Ac.1.12 cents out of Ac 3.35 cents in Sy.No.3/2, Patta no. 87, ward No. 16, Block No.37, Kummaripalem Valanda lands village, Near yatha Kummaripalem, Bheemunipalem Municiplaity Limits, Bheemunipatnam SRO, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to land to an extent of Ac.1.12 cents out of Ac 3.35 cents in Sy.No.3/2, Patta no. 87, ward No. 16, Block No.37, Kummaripalem Valanda lands village, Near yatha Kummaripalem, Bheemunipalem Municiplaity Limits, Bheemunipatnam SRO, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 not to interfere in civil disputes between 5th respondent and me pertaining to land to an extent of Ac.1.12 cents out of Ac 3.35 cents in Sy.No.3/2, Patta no. 87, ward No. 16, Block No.37, Kummaripalem Valanda lands village, Near yatha Kummaripalem, Bheemunipaiem Municiplaity Limits, Bheemunipatnam SRO, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh and not to harass the petitioners in calling to the respondent No.4 Police Station for settling the disputes, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner/proposed Respondent No.6 as Respondent No.6 in W.P.No.13607 of 2022, and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 3 pleased to vacate the direction granted on 05.05.2022 in I.A.No.01/2022 in W.P.No.13607 of 2022, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA RAMA KRISHNA KOLLURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13607 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No.4 in interfering with the matters of civil disputes between 5th respondent and me pertaining to land to an extent of Ac.1.12 cents out of Ac 3.35 cents in Sy.No.3/2, Patta no. 87, ward No. 16, Block No.37, Kummaripalem Valanda lands village, Near yatha Kummaripalem, Bheemunipalem Municiplaity Limits, Bheemunipatnam SRO, Visakhapatnam District, as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and also violating Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere in civil dispute pertains to land to an extent of Ac.1.12 cents out of Ac 3.35 cents in Sy.No.3/2, Patta no. 87, ward No. 16, Block No.37, Kummaripalem Valanda lands village, Near yatha Kummaripalem, Bheemunipalem Municiplaity Limits, Bheemunipatnam SRO, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.11.2025. UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.13607 of 2022 Dated.05.11.2025 UPS 134