IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.102 Vishal@ Vicky@ Daku@Vinay State of Haryana and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Prashant Lather, Advocate for Mr.Ketan Antil Mr.P.P.Chahar DEEPAK SIBAL, J (1) On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, Commissioner, Karnal Division, Karnal is impleaded as respondent No.6. (2) Registry to make necessary change (3) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No. Karnal, to finally dispose of the recommendations made by the Jail Authorities, District Jail, Karnal to respondent No. pending decision since (4) Learned State counsel alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. (5) After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole ha unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022. (6) In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to respondent No. 28.10.2024 for the grant of parole, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. 05.05.2025 vandana IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Daku@Vinay Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Prashant Lather, Advocate for Ketan Antil, Advocate, for the petitioner. P.P.Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, Commissioner, Karnal is impleaded as respondent No.6. Registry to make necessary changes in the memo of parties. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No. to finally dispose of the recommendations made by the Jail Authorities, District to respondent No.6 for grant of parole to the petitioner, as the same has been pending decision since 28.10.2024. Learned State counsel has no objection to the acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole ha unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022. In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction respondent No.6 to take a final decision on the petitioner’s request made on for the grant of parole, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4517-2025 Date of decision : 05.05.2025 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate, for the petitioner. On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, Commissioner, Karnal in the memo of parties. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts his prayer to the issuance of directions to respondent No.6-Commissioner, Karnal Division, to finally dispose of the recommendations made by the Jail Authorities, District for grant of parole to the petitioner, as the same has been has no objection to the acceptance of the afore After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, we find that the decision on the petitioner’s request for grant of parole has been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 2022. In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to take a final decision on the petitioner’s request made on for the grant of parole, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE : Yes / No :Yes / No Petitioner On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, Commissioner, Karnal At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he restricts his al Division, to finally dispose of the recommendations made by the Jail Authorities, District for grant of parole to the petitioner, as the same has been has no objection to the acceptance of the afore After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, s been unnecessarily delayed by the State which is also against the spirit behind Section 12 of In the light of the above, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to take a final decision on the petitioner’s request made on for the grant of parole, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of VANDANA 2025.05.07 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document