JAGDEV SINGH RETD.(SSA) v. KULWINDER SHARMA AND OTHERS
COCP/3486/2025 · 2026-02-17
Nidhi Gupta
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5271 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5271 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 105
Jagdev Sin
Sh. Kulwi division, P District Ba
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
violation o ordinate B State Elect and anothe COCP-3486-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.3486 o
Date of decision ev Singh Retd. (SSA) Versus ulwinder Sharma, Senior Executiv ion, PSEB now Punjab State Power ict Bathinda and others
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. D.D. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
HI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Present contempt petition tion of order dated 07.1.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-117 Electricity Board vs. Presiding Offic nother”, whereby it was observed as u
“8. Keeping in view already been executed award of the Labour (Annexure P-3) is mod employee will be rein being any back wages.
9. Learned counsel submitted that as resp retired and his pension
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3486 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-17.02.2026 …..Petitioner xecutive Engineer, Distribution ower Corporation Ltd., Mour, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA
ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 11775-2004 titled as “Punjab Officer, Labour Court, Bathinda ed as under :- iew the fact that the award has uted except back wages, the bour Court dated 07.04.2004 modified that the respondent- reinstated but without there es. sel for the respondent has respondent No.2 has already sionary benefits have not been VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 09.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
prays for w file executi
February Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
COCP-3486-2025 (O & M) released hence, the
directed that in case, th not been released to the be released keeping i respondent No.2 within the receipt of the copy o
At the very outset, learned s for withdrawal of the present contem xecution petition.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, uary 17, 2026
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
2 the petitioner-authorities be e, the pensionary benefits have o the respondent No.2, the same ng in view the entitlement of ithin a period of two months of py of this order….” arned counsel for the petitioner contempt petition with liberty to if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 09.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document