Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5271 (PNJ)

JAGDEV SINGH RETD.(SSA) v. KULWINDER SHARMA AND OTHERS

COCP/3486/2025 · 2026-02-17

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 105 Jagdev Sin Sh. Kulwi division, P District Ba CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B State Elect and anothe COCP-3486-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3486 o Date of decision ev Singh Retd. (SSA) Versus ulwinder Sharma, Senior Executiv ion, PSEB now Punjab State Power ict Bathinda and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. D.D. Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 07.1.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-117 Electricity Board vs. Presiding Offic nother”, whereby it was observed as u “8. Keeping in view already been executed award of the Labour (Annexure P-3) is mod employee will be rein being any back wages. 9. Learned counsel submitted that as resp retired and his pension 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3486 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-17.02.2026 …..Petitioner xecutive Engineer, Distribution ower Corporation Ltd., Mour, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 11775-2004 titled as “Punjab Officer, Labour Court, Bathinda ed as under :- iew the fact that the award has uted except back wages, the bour Court dated 07.04.2004 modified that the respondent- reinstated but without there es. sel for the respondent has respondent No.2 has already sionary benefits have not been VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 09.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document prays for w file executi February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3486-2025 (O & M) released hence, the directed that in case, th not been released to the be released keeping i respondent No.2 within the receipt of the copy o At the very outset, learned s for withdrawal of the present contem xecution petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 17, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 the petitioner-authorities be e, the pensionary benefits have o the respondent No.2, the same ng in view the entitlement of ithin a period of two months of py of this order….” arned counsel for the petitioner contempt petition with liberty to if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 09.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document