Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5270 (KAR)

SRI KRISHNA G TURAKANI S/O GANAPATHI v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

WP/102856/2024 · 2025-02-12

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2848 WP No. 102856 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102856 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. KRISHNA S/O. GANGADHAR TURKANI, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. GUEST LECTURER, R/O: PANJI ONI CHANNAPETH OLD HUBLI, HUBLI -580024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI B. N. MULIMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, UNNATHA SHIKSHNA SOUDHA, SESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURU -560001. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, REGIONAL OFFICE (COLLEGIATE EDUCATION) MINIVIDHAN SOUDHA, DHARWAD -580001. 4. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVT FIRST GRADE COLLEGE, DHARWAD -580001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GANGADHAR J.M, AAG AND SMT KIRTHILATA R. PATIL, HCGP) VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.18 11:21:53 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2848 WP No. 102856 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR IN NATURE OF ANY OTHER WRIT DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY PETITIONER TO CONTINUE HIS SERVICE IN THE RESPONDENT COLLEGE 4 VIDE ANNEXURE F TILL END OF THIS ACADEMIC YEAR 2023-24. PASS SUCH ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE AS IN DUTY BOUND THE PETITIONER SHALL EVER PRAY AN ACT OF KINDNESS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petition has rendered infructuous by efflux of time. In the light of the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition stands disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP / CT: ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 50