221 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2137-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.09.2025 MOHAN LAL GOEL ..Petitioner Versus MANAV MALIK, ESTATE OFFICER, HSVP PANCHKULA ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate (through v.c.) Ms. Nihar Bala, Advocate for respondent. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. The contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 17.03.2025 passed in by this Court in CWP-6706-2021. 2. The relevant portion of order dated 17.03.2025, is reproduced as under:- “34. In aftermath, CWP-1202-2019 filed by the HUDA is dismissed being devoid of any merits, whereas, CWP-6706-2021, filed by the petitioner-allottee, is allowed. 35. The relevant part of the impugned order (Annexure P-15), wherebys, the petitioner-allottee is held liable to pay the extension fee towards non-construction of the plot in question, is quashed and set aside.” MOHD AYUB 2025.09.03 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2137-2025 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned counsel for the parties contends that judgment dated 17.03.2025, passed in CWP-1202-2019 & CWP-6706-2021 has been stayed by Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 29.08.2025 passed in SLP(C) No(s).21014-21015/2025. 4. In view of the same, the present petition is dismissed. 5. Needless to say that liberty is however granted to the petitioner to avail the remedy as is available to him in accordance with law after the decision by Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP(C) No(s).21014-21015/2025. 6. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. September 02nd, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.09.03 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.