Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52683 (KAR)

THE COMMISSIONER v. SMT K SUBHASHINI D/O. SRI.KANALA RAGHAVAIAH

WP/147975/2020 · 2025-07-29

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9303-DB WP No. 147975 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 147975 OF 2020 (S-CAT) BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, NAVODYAY VIDYALAYA SAMITI, B.15, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, SECTOR 62, NOIDA: 201307, DISTRICT GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR (U.P). 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI, HYDERABAD REGION, N.L.I.BUILDINGS, NALAGANDLA ROAD, POST AND VILLAGE: GOPANPALLY, RANGAREDDY DISTRICT HYDERABAD-500107, TELANGANA STATE. 3. THE UNION OF INDIA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, (DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY), GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI: 110001. …PETITIONERS (BY SHRI M. B. KANAVI, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. K. SUBHASHINI D/O. SRI. KANALA RAGHAVAIAH, AGE: 56 YEARS, PRINCIPAL JNV, JNV QUARTERS, KORLAHALLI, MUNDARGI TALUK, GADAG-582118. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 6TH JANUARY 2020 OF THE HON’BLE CAT, BANGALORE IN O.A. NO.170/00584/2019 ON ITS FILE (ANNEXURE-A IN THE W.P) AND ETC. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9303-DB WP No. 147975 of 2020 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as follows: “The advocate for the petitioners humbly submits that, the respondent has attained superannuation and retired from the service and hence the writ petition has become infructuous, Hence, the W.P. may be disposed of as having become infructuous in the interest of justice.” In light of the same, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE RKM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1