IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23579 OF 2004 Between: B.S. Subbaratnam, S/o. B. Satyanarayanaiah, Aged about 59 years, R/o. D.No. 11-11-11, Opp: Ninkampaiii Road, Hindupur, Anantapur District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The Deputy Registrar of Coop Societies, Hindupur, Anantapur District. 2. The Sub Divisional Cooperative Officer, Hindurpur, Anantapur District. 3. The Hindupur Cooperative Stores Limited, Sri Vasavi Dharmasala Road, Hindurpur, Anantapur District. Rep. by its President. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction declaring the order of the 1 E.P.No. 15/2003-5 dated 26-8-2004 as illegal arbitrary and one without St respondent passed in jurisdiction and pass such other order or further orders as the Hon’ble Court feels deem fit and porper in the facts and circumstances of the case. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP. NO: 30930 OF 2004^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 1®' respondent passed in E.P.No. 15/2004-5 dated 26-8-2004 pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: APHC010247312004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) HJflB [3332] I THURSDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23579/2004 Between: ...PETITIONER B.s. Subbaratnam, AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Dy Registrar Of Coop Societies Hindupur 2 and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.G SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.04.2025 and 17.04.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today 2. there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There 3. shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // ^ SECTJON OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. G SEKHAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP FOR COOPERATION. High Court Of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies sree J HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.23579 of 2004 o 2 <1 SE? 2025 ( ar ^ . Currenf. saciion ★ DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS