Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5268 (UTT)

RAMAVATAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1114/2025 · 2025-04-22

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2878 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 22nd APRIL, 2025 WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO.1114 of 2025 Ramavatar and Others ..…Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ..…Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Aakib Ahmed, Advocate. Counsel for the : Mr. M.S. Bisht, Respondents Nos.1 to 3 Brief Holder. Counsel for the : Mr. Rahul Consul, Respondent No.4 Advocate. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. Present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:- “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondent no.3 to consider and decide the representations dated 13.01.2025 (Annexure No.2) filed by the Petitioners for grant of marriage and, (ii) Issue any other appropriate order or direction as the Hon’ble Court thinks fit and proper. (iii) Award the cost to the petitioner.” 1 2025:UHC:2878 2. Heard Mr. Aakib Ahmed, learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. M.S. Bisht, learned Brief Holder for respondent nos.1 to 3 and Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 3. Mr. Aakib Ahmed, Advocate, submitted that the petitioners have duly registered themselves under the Marriage Grant Scheme in order to avail the benefits of the said Scheme. But, the petitioners have not been granted the benefit under the said Scheme. The representations dated 13.01.2025 have been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent no.3, the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar. The said representations are still pending. 4. Mr. Aakib Ahmed, Advocate, has submitted on instructions that the petitioners shall submit their representations before the Secretary of the respondent no.4 in the prescribed format within two weeks’ from today. He has requested to decide the present writ petition directing the respondent no.4 to decide the said representation as early as possible. 5. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate, has sought eight weeks’ time for deciding the petitioners’ representation. 6. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present Writ Petition ((M/S) No.1114 of 2 2025:UHC:2878 2025) is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioners submit their representations in prescribed format along with a certified copy of this order within two weeks’ from today, the respondent no.4 shall decide the said representations at the earliest but not later than eight weeks’ from the date of submission of the representations and the certified copy of this order. 7. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of this case. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt:22.04.2025 Neha 3 NEHA BISHT Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f0148 36d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9C CE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.04.22 19:17:12 +05'30'