SRI SANTOSH HANAMANT SHIRANAL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/105158/2024 · 2025-04-17
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52677 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52677 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6587 WP No. 105158 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 105158 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI SANTOSH HANAMANT SHIRANAL, AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYED, R/O C/O. PARASURAM BIRAPPA DAREGOND, R/O AT AND POST THEGGI, TALUK: BILAGI, DISTRICT: BAGALKOT-587 117. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.M.DHARIGOND., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY UNDER SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VISHWESHWARAYYA TOWER, BENGALURU-560 001.
3.
THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT WING, OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT DISTRICT: BAGALKOT-587 101.
4.
THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, JAMAKHANDI, TQ. JAMAKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587 113. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA.R.PATIL., HCGP FOR R1-3;
SRI. PRAKASH HOSAMANE., ADVOCATE FOR R4)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6587 WP No. 105158 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.H.M.Dharigond., counsel for the petitioner, Smt.Kirtilata.R.Patil., HCGP for respondents 1 to 3 and Sri.Prakash Hosamane., counsel for respondent No.4 have appeared in person.
2. The petitioner has filed an application on 04.10.2023 to appointment him as a First Division Assistant on compassionate grounds. The petitioner’s grievance is that the second respondent has not considered the same till today. Hence, he is before this Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus.
3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several
contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care.
4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing respondent No.2 to consider the
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6587 WP No. 105158 of 2024
application dated:04.10.2023 submitted by the petitioner vide Annexures-C. Counsel for the respondents submits that an appropriate
order may be passed.
5. A Mandamus is ordered directing respondent No.2 to consider the application submitted by the petitioner on 04.10.2023 vide Annexure-C in accordance with the law, within six weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered.
6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP,RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50