IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 1410 Naresh Kumar and others Guru Nanak Dev University and another CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. stipulation in condition of 2. there being no interim order in favour of the petitioners, during pendency of the instant case, 10 of them were granted regularization while 10 relieved and the remaining 41 were found to be unfit. 3. revived by demonstrating that the 04.07.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Naresh Kumar and others Versus Guru Nanak Dev University and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioners. Mr. M.K.Dogra, Advocate and Ms. Vidhushi Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing stipulation in Advertisement Nos.11/2007, 3/2008 and 7/2008 wherein condition of “on Contract Basis for three years” was mentioned. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that in wake of there being no interim order in favour of the petitioners, during pendency of the instant case, 10 of them were granted regularization while 10 relieved and the remaining 41 were found to be unfit. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner revived by demonstrating that the lis still subsists. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13115-2012 (O & M) Date of decision: 04.07.2025 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. M.K.Dogra, Advocate and Ms. Vidhushi Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing of Advertisement Nos.11/2007, 3/2008 and 7/2008 wherein n Contract Basis for three years” was mentioned. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that in wake of there being no interim order in favour of the petitioners, during pendency of the instant case, 10 of them were granted regularization while 10 relieved and the remaining 41 were found to be unfit. Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.04 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.