119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25477-2025 DECIDED ON: 12.05.2025 JARNAIL SINGH .....PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS 2023 for issuance of directions to the official respondents No.1 to 4 to take appropriate legal action against the private respondent under the suitable provisions of law and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner from any false implication at the behest of the private respondents by taking a conscious decision upon representation the dated 05.02.2025 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner. Anuradha 2025.05.13 23:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-25477-2025 2 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala to decide the representation dated 05.02.2025 (Annexure P-4) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2- the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 05.02.2025 (Annexure P-4) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 12.05.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.13 23:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document