KUMAR MAHADEV ADISHERI v. TTHE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
WP/102518/2025 · 2025-08-22
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52669 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52669 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10721 WP No. 102518 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 102518 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
KUMAR MAHADEV ADISHERI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: UMARAN, TQ: CHKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI – 590 001. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. V. M. SHEELVANT, SRI. VINAY S. KOUJALAGI, SRI. M.L. VANTI & SRI. ROHIT L. SHEELVANT., ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. TTHE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACT BY ITS PRNCIPAL SECRETARY M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, DIST. BELGAUM – 590 001. 3. THE TALUKA EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TALUKA PANCHAYAT OFFICE, CHIKKODI, DIST. BELGAUM – 590 001. 4. THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GRAM PANCHAYAT, UMRANI, TQ. CHIKKODI, DIST. BELGAUM – 590 001. Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10721 WP No. 102518 of 2025
5. THE SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT, UMRANI, TQ. CHKKODI, DIST. BELGAUM – 590 005. 6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF DEPUTY COMMISSONER, BELAGAVI – 590 001. 7. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSONER, OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, R/O CHIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI – 590 005. 8. THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF TAHSILDAR, CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI – 590 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM., AGA FOR R1, R6 TO R8;
SRI. SHIVARAJ HIREMATH., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO FORM PUCCA ROAD/TAR ROAD RUNNING THROUGH SY. NO. 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 IN PURSUANCE OF SCHEME OF GOVERNMENT UNDER NAMMA HOLA, NAMMA DHARI YOJANE, BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 18.7.2024, 16.7.2024, 2.2.2022, 3.2.2022, 27.10.21, 3.2.22, 14.10.2024, 2.2.2022 OF THE PETITIONER PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C TO C8 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10721 WP No. 102518 of 2025
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1.
The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent authorities to form pucca road/Tar road running through Sy.No. 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 in pursuance of scheme of government under “Namma Hola, Namma Dhari Yojane” by considering the representations, dated 18.7.2024, 16.7.2024, 2.2.2022, 3.2.2022, 27.10.21, 3.2.22, 14.10.2024, 2.2.2022 of the petitioners produced at Annexure-C to C8 in the interest of justice and equity. b. Grant any other order or relief deemed fit in the circumstances of the case. 2. A short grievance of the petitioner is that despite the State having initiated a scheme “Namma Hola Namma Dhari Yojane”, land of the petitioner still does not have access to a road, and as such a representation having been submitted at Annexure-C to C8 have not been favorably considered by the respondents. - 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10721 WP No. 102518 of 2025
3. Sri. Shivaraj Hiremath., learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 to 5 submits that the representation of the petitioner has indeed been considered, when the neighboring landowners have objected to the same, and as such the objections are now going to be forwarded to respondent No.8- Thasildar for necessary consideration within a period of two weeks from now. 4. Learned AGA submits that, if the same is received necessary orders would be passed by respondent No.8 and action taken for formation of the road. The same answers the grievances of the petitioner. 5. In that view of the matter, I pass the following; ORDER i. The writ petition is disposed of. ii. Respondent No.2 to 5 are directed to forward the objections received from neighboring landowners to respondent No.8 within a period
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:10721 WP No. 102518 of 2025
of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. iii. Respondent No.8 is directed to consider the said objections and pass necessary order within 12 weeks thereafter. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39