Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52667 (AP)

SETTIPALLI PRAMEELA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/31469/2025 · 2025-11-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010604822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31469/2025 Between: 1. SETTIPALLI PRAMEELA, W/O P. VENKATA RATHNAM, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC SODAM MANDAL THASILDAR, R/O D. NO 1-122, GROUND FLOOR, SUBHADRA GOVINDA NILAYAM SREENIVASA PURAM, TIRUPATI CITY AND DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU OF POLICE, 2 ND FLOOR, NTR BUS COMPLEX, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT). 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, KADAPA RANGE, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, NEW BALAJI COLONY BRANCH, D. NO 8-50/1, OPP AIR BYPASS ROAD, , TIRUPATI CITY AND DISTRICT, (ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT). ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents No 3 continuously kept in freezing the bank account No 564610110003999 on the file of 4 th respondent belonging to petitioner, even though the 2 Investigation is completed in respect of Cr.No.01/RCT- KDP/2024 dated registered under section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act,2018 dated 11.03.2024 and send investigation Report to the 1 st respondent without considering the 4 th respondent letter in Ref. No CHG/BM/2025-26/005 dated 16.09.2025 being illegal, arbitrary violation of section 106 of Bharatiya Nyaya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhitha.2023 besides Article 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to allow to its original operation and pass.” 2. Heard Sri. Tata Singaiah Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner and Learned Special Public Prosecutor for ACB appearing for the respondents. 3. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for ACB brought to the notice of this Court that a very same case was filed by the petitioner earlier in W.P.No.18197 of 2025 inviting order from this Court dated 18.08.2025 wherein this Court granted liberty to the petitioner to open a fresh account for drawing his salary and further drawing and disbursing officer was directed to honour the request of the petitioner and enable him to receive his salary after his reinstatement. He would further submit that investigation is completed in this matter and charge sheet also filed. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.11.2025 RSD 3 62 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 31469 of 2025 Date:14.11.2025 RSD