Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52666 (ALL)

SATENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/13952/2025 · 2025-05-05

Manish Kumar Nigam

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72402 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13952 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents Authority to make fixation of the boundary Pillars, in pursuance of the order passed by Sub-Divisional officer, Tehsil-Madhogarh, District- Jalaun dated 16.08.2024, under section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 and further be directed them to ensure availability of police force on the spot, at the time of fixing the boundary pillar. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent NO.2/ Sub-Divisional officer, Madhogarh, District- Jalaun to ensure the execution of the order dated 16.08.2024 passed by him under section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 by directing the Revenue Inspector to fix the boundary pillar and also direct the concerned Station House officer to ensure availability of police force on the spot, at the time of fixation of the boundary pillar." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an order under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been passed on 16.08.2024 for demarcation of the land but the same has not been given effect to. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent no. 2 be directed to get the land demarcated. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application before respondent no. 2 along with certified copy of this order within two weeks. 6. In case, such an application is moved by the petitioner, the respondent no. 2 is directed to get the land of the petitioner demarcated and get the boundary marks installed in pursuance of its own order 16.08.2024, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad