Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52664 (PNJ)

URJA GOYAL @ RITU GOYAL v. ASSEEM GOYAL & ANR

CRR/3138/2016 · 2025-03-24

Namit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 221 CRR-3138-2016(O&M) Date of Decision: 24.03.2025 Urja Goyal alias Ritu Goyal ….. Petitioner VERSUS Asseem Goyal & anr. .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Birinder Singh Khehar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Varun Jain, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab. NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 401 Cr.PC impugning the order dated 23.02.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the accused-respondent No.1 has been acquitted. 2. The instant revision petition was filed along with an application for condonation of delay of 1179 days in filing the revision petition. Notice in the said application was issued on 07.10.2016. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that a compromise has been effected between the parties and he has produced a copy of the statement of the petitioner-wife Urja Goel alias Ritu Goel recorded before the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Amloh, dated 11.02.2019, in a petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, wherein she has stated that she shall withdraw all the cases filed against the respondent-husband and his family Monika Verma 2025.03.25 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh CRR-3138-2016(O&M) -2- members and also withdraw her petition filed before this Court vide CRR- 3138-2016 and other cases. Factum of her statement has also been taken into consideration by the said Court while granting decree for dissolution of marriage with mutual consent vide order dated 15.02.2019. On the basis of the said development, learned counsel submits that this petition has become infructuous. 4. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 5. Pending application (if any) also stand disposed of. 24.03.2025 (NAMIT KUMAR) monika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Monika Verma 2025.03.25 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh