tyi.'v/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO lA No. 1 OF 2025 f JT I? \ IN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10027 OF 2025 Between: Gudimetla Raj Kumar @ Chinnu, S/o Gudimetla Ananda, Aged about 30 years, R/o D.No.36-8-32, Sudarshan Rao Street, Near Chaitanya Techno School Wood Pet, Nehru Nagar, Vijayawada (Urban), Krishna District, A.P Petitioner/Accused No.04 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, Through Station House Officer, Krishnadevipeta Police Station, Anakapalli District. Respondent Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. (under section 482 of Cr.P.C), is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax / modify the conditions, specifically the condition imposed by this Hon’ble Court vide its Order dt. 14.10.2025 in CRLP. 10027 of 2025 directing the petitioner/Accus ed No.04 shall be enlarged on bail subject to his executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge- cum- Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, VIsakhapatnam and impose such other condition (S) that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Pending disposal of CRLP No. 10027 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated: 14.10.2025 and upon hearing the arguments of Dr ANWAR SHAIK, Advocate for the Petitioner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, for the Respondent: The Court made the following ORDER: Heard both. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the condition imposed in paragraph No.4, clause (i), of the order passed by this Court is onerous and beyond the financial capabilities of the petitioner, and therefore he could not comply with the said condition. Hence, he constrained to remain In jail. was Considering the above, paragraph No.4, clause (I), is relaxed. The petitloner/Accused No.4 shall be enlarged on bail upon his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each, to the satisfaction of the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam.” SD/-SK MD RAFI DEPUTY^EGI^TRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for Trial of Offences under NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Station House Officer, Krishnadevipeta Police Station, Anakapalli District. 4. One CC to Sri. Dr ANWAR SHAIK, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati. [OUT 6. One spare copy KJ HIGH COURT DR.YLR, J DATED:05.12.2025 ORDER lA No. 1 OF 2025 IN CRLP.No.10027 of 2025 DIRECTION o sy m OCl ; ./O ge QEC^ as o ■=3cr, ★