1 2025:CGHC:49761-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1349 of 2025 Bhaskar Prasad Tripathi S/o Bhagwat Prasad Tripathi Aged About 55 Years R/o House No. 1469, Vivekanand Nagar, Phase-Ii, Mopka, P/s Sarkanda, Tehsil And Dist - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 – SHO, Police Sarkanda, Dist - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Superintendent Of Police (Ajak) Police Station - Schedule Caste And Schedule Tribe Welfare, Sarkanda, Bilaspur 4 - Shri Kishanlal Banjare S/o Late Nand Kumar Banjare R/o Ward No. 48, Infront Of Vasudev Convection, Vivekanand Nagar, Phase-Ii, Mopka, Police Station - Sarkanda, Tehsil And Dist - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Ms. Saumya Sharma, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Asseem Bhagwat Gopal, Advocate SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.10.07 17:51:27 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 07.10.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quashed the impugned FIR No. 125/2025 for the alleged offence punishable under section Section 318(4), 296, 351(2) of BNS read with section 3(1) (Dh), 3(2) (VK) of the Prevention of Atrocity Act, registered by police of the Police Station Sarkanda, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard on I.A. No.02/2025, application for amendment in the petition. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that the charge sheet has been filed and charges have been framed against the present petitioner by the trial Court. 4. Although the amendment application has been filed by the petitioner to amend the grounds, relief clause and other parts of the petition, this Court observed that the present petition is appears to inappropriate and incomplete, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law and does not wish to 3 press this amendment application. 5. Accordingly, I.A. No. 02/2025 is dismissed as not pressed. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 7. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed. 8. It is made clear that if the petitioner prefers a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet and other proceedings regarding the case, a copy of the said petition shall be served upon the counsel for the private respondent. 9. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice S. Bhilwar