Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52653 (AP)

YENUGONDA REDDY SEKHARA NAIDU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/17332/2022 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010292312022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17332/2022 Between: 1. YENUGONDA REDDY SEKHARA NAIDU, S/O Y. CHINNA REDDEPPA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. AGGRICULTURE, DOOR NO.2-21, RAGAPPAGARIPALLI, KALAKADA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTI. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KALAKADA POLICE STATION, KALAKADA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. R CHALAPATHI NAIDU, S/O PEDDA REDDEPPA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. AGGRICULTURE, RAGAPPAGARIPALLI, KALAKADA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. R RAGHUPATHI NAIDU, S/O PEDDA REDDEPPA NAIDU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. AGGRICULTURE, RAGAPPAGARIPALLI, KALAKADA MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 3rdrespondent in interfering with the civil disputes, construction activities of the petitioner by demolishing the old House No.2-21, Ragappagaripalli, Kalakada Mandal, Annamayya District at the instance of the un -official respondents as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with civil disputes between the petitioner and the un-official respondents in respect of house construction pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17332 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil disputes, construction activities of the petitioner by demolishing the old House No.2-21, Ragappagaripalli, Kalakada Mandal, Annamayya District at the instance of the un -official respondents as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and to pass..…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that case in Cr.No.63 of 2022, U/sec. 324, 323, 506 r/w 34 of IPC has been registered basing on the complaint of the Petitioner’s son. He would further submit that basing on the complaint of the 4th Respondent herein, a case in Cr.No.64 of 2022 U/Sec. 341, 324, 323, 506 r/w 34 of IPC has been registered against the Petitioner and others. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders. 4. Recording the above said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the above said crimes. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.11.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.17332 of 2022 Dated.22.11.2025 UPS 171