ANOOP KUMAR v. PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS
CWP/12971/2012 · 2025-01-16
Aman Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52648 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52648 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2024:PHHC:057757
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210
CWP-12971-2012 (O&M)
Date of decision: 29.04.2024
Anoop Kumar
...Petitioner
Versus
Punjab Public Service Commission and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
***** Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab.
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J (Oral)
1.
The prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider the candidature of the petitioner under Ex Serviceman-BC category.
2.
No application had been filed by learned counsel for the petitioner to implead the parties in the present writ petition in terms of the
order dated 12.09.2023 and today there is no representation on his behalf as well, despite the case having been called out twice.
3.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the present case.
4.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 29.04.2024 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned
: Yes / No Whether reportable
: Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.04.29 16:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment