Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52648 (MAD)

Pooja Malhotra v. The Assistant Commissioner of Police,

CRL OP/13625/2025 · 2025-04-30

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.13625 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.13625 of 2025 Pooja Malhotra ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyber Crime Cell, Central Crime Branch, Commissioner of Office Campus, Tambaram. 2. Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Commissioner office Campus, Tambaram. 3. The Branch Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank, I-9, Kalkaji, New Delhi – 110 019. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.N.S., to direct the second respondent to instruct the third respondent to de-freeze the account bearing number 1246004883 in the petitioner's name maintained with the third respondent within a time to be fixed by this Court. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.13625 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.Leelesh Sundaram for M/s.Nathan and Associates For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) (for R1 & R2) O R D E R This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to instruct the third respondent to de-freeze the account bearing number 1246004883 in the petitioner's name maintained with the third respondent within a time that may be fixed by this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first and second respondents and perused the materials placed on record. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first and second respondents, on instructions, states that as instructed by the second respondent, the third respondent froze the account of the petitioner since the petitioner's account has been used as a second-layer account by the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.13625 of 2025 accused and a sum of Rs.13,027/- was deposited. However, the third respondent now froze the account of the petitioner and did not permit the petitioner to operate his account apart from the said amount. 4. In view of the above, the third respondent is directed to hold the sum of Rs.13,027/- under lien and permit the petitioner to operate his account apart from the said amount. 5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 30.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation/Yes/No kv 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.13625 of 2025 To 1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cyber Crime Cell, Central Crime Branch, Commissioner of Office Campus, Tambaram. 2. Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Commissioner office Campus, Tambaram. 3. The Branch Manager, Kotak Mahindra Bank, I-9, Kalkaji, New Delhi – 110 019. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.13625 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. kv Crl.O.P.No.13625 of 2025 30.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis