HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SECOND APPEAL No. - 2994 of 1983 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. On 05.10.2016, notice was issued to the appellant as well as respondents to engage another counsel. 2. Office report dated 07.09.2017 indicates that notice sent to the sole appellant returned back with remarks 'incomplete address'. As far as respondents no.1 & 2 are concerned, notice has returned with postal remarks 'incomplete address'. As far as respondent no.3, notice returned with remarks 'died'. Again, notices were issued on 14.09.2017. 3. Office report dated 15.09.2025 indicates that notice has not returned back after service. 4. In view of the said office report, notice upon appellant as well as respondents are deemed to be sufficient. 5. As no one has appeared on behalf of appellant to press the appeal, appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. September 16, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : S.U.Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : V.K.Gupta (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Vidya Devi .....Appellant(s) Ram Pal .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad