Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52638 (ALL)

PRATIBHA KARNWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/68271/2013 · 2025-10-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 68271 of 2013 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Sri Ashish Malhotra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause of action survives in the present writ petition and same has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. October 9, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Malhotra, Pushpila Bisht Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashish Agarwal, Deo Prakash Singh, M.D.Singh Shekhar (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Pratibha Karnwal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad