Athukuri Ramalingeswararao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/24604/2021 · 2025-10-13
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52632 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 52632 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010400262021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24604/2021 Between:
1. ATHUKURI RAMALINGESWARARAO,, S/O.KOTI BRAHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS. RIO FLAT NO.G2, GUPTA'S SYMPONY, LAWYERPET, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ONGOLE TALUQ POLICE STATION, ONGOLE CITY, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in interfering into Civil disputes of the petitioner's at the instance of third parties, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner's life and liberty at the instance of the 3rd parties and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere in any manner in to the civil disputes of the petitioner at the instance of 3"I parties, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioner seeking the following relief:
“...to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents 3 and 4 in interfering into Civil disputes of the petitioner's at the instance of third parties, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner's life and liberty at the instance of the 3rd parties and pass ....”
None represented for the Petitioner. At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State on instructions would submit that respondent police never interfered in the civil disputes of the Petitioner and third parties and would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this Writ Petition. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 24604 of 2021
14.10.2025
Mjl /*