Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010605152024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 31503/2024 Between:
1. RAMAPURAM MADHURAVATHI, W/O RAMAPURAM NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. FP SHOP DEALER, SHOP. NO. 1004010, MEDDEMMA SELF HELP GROUP, R/O PEDDATIPPASAMUDRAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CONSUMERAFFAIRS AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER CIVIL SUPPLIES, AP STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD, D. NO. 10-152/1, CIVIL SUPPLIES BHAVAN, 3RD FLOOR, SRI SAI TOWERS, BESIDE SIRIS COMPANY, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520007. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
MAGISTRATE, RAYACHOTY, CHITTOOR NOW ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB COLLECTOR, MANDANAPALLE DIVISION, CHITTOOR NOVY ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDATIPPASAMUDRAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 VS,J
W.P.No.31503 of 2024
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 4th respondent in issuing notification vide Ref. No. C1/1020/2024 dated 07.12.2024 is contrary to the order passed by this Honble Court in WP No. 22633 of 2024 dated 04.10.2024, and Clause 9 of G.O. Ms. No. 32 dated 03.12.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and violations of Article 14,19 and 21 and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased stay all further proceedings issued by the 4th respondent vide Ref. No. C1/1020/2024 dated 07.12.2024 in respect of the petitioner fair price shop vide Shop. No. 1004010 situated at Peddatippasamudram Mandal, Chittoor Now Annamayya District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
3 VS,J
W.P.No.31503 of 2024
The Court made the following Order:
The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-
“… to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or direction declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 4th respondent in issuing notification vide Ref. No. C1/1020/2024 dated 07.12.2024 is contrary to the order passed by this Honble Court in WP No. 22633 of 2024 dated 04.10.2024, and Clause 9 of G.O. Ms. No. 32 dated 03.12.2018 is illegal, arbitrary and violations of Article 14,19 and 21 and consequently set aside the same ….”
2. During hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition, which pertains to roster points, is squarely covered by the order of this Court passed in Writ Petition No.31508 of 2024 & batch, dated 24.11.2025 and requested to pass a similar order in this writ petition also. The same is not disputed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies representing the respondents. The operative portion of the said order, reads as under:
“5. As the said roster points were prepared behind the back of the petitioners, this Court, instead of going into merits of the case, feels it appropriate to dispose of all writ petitions by directing the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer / Appointing Authority to exhibit change of roster points by way of a notice affixed on the notice board of the jurisdictional office of the Tahsildar and as well as the Revenue Divisional Officer, which would be visible to each and every person, so as to enable the effected fair price shop dealers to raise objections, if any, before the concerned authorities within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of exhibiting the said notice in the notice boards. After receiving the objections from the fair price shop dealers, the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer/ Appointing authority shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders within a period of two (02) weeks thereafter.
Consequently, the concerned
4 VS,J
W.P.No.31503 of 2024
Revenue Divisional Officer/Appointing Authority shall proceed further for appointment of a permanent fair price shop dealer, by way of issuing a fresh notification. 6. In view of the same, the impugned notifications pertaining to the petitioner’s Fair Price Shop are set aside with a liberty to Revenue Divisional Officer/Appointing Authority to issue a fresh notification after following the above procedure. 7. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are allowed.”
3. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is also allowed in terms of the common order dated 24.11.2025 passed by this Court in W.P. No. 31508 of 2024 and batch. There shall be no
order as to costs.
4. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order in Writ Petition No.31508 of 2024 & batch dated 24.11.2025, to this order. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Dated: 01.12.2025 KGR