APHC010513632014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30366/2014 Between: 1. A.UMA MAHESWARA REDDY & CO., (INDIAN OIL DEALERS), BYE PASS ROAD, MANGALAGIRI 522 503, GUNTUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE B.S.R.K.D.V.PRASAD S/O VEERABHADAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O MANGALAGIRI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING OFFICE AT 307913, J.B.TITO MARG, SADIQ NAGAR, NEW DELHI. 2. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, APSO, HAVING OFFICE AT NO. 3-6-436 TO 438, II & IIIRD FLOOR, NASPUR HOUSE, HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD - 500029 3. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 3RD FLOOR, GVR TOWERS, BHARATHI NAGAR, RING ROAD, VIJAYAWADA - 520008. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or direction more particularly 2 JS,J W.P.No.30366/2014 one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in blocking the supplies of the MS & HSD to the petitioner firm is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to resume the supplies of MS & HSD to the petitioner firm IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 37967 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to resume the supplies of MS & HSD to the petitioner firm IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 167031 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MEKA RAJASEKHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA 2. DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE 3 JS,J W.P.No.30366/2014 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner has filed the present writ petition declaring the action of the respondents in blocking the supplies of MS&HSD to the petitioner firm. Learned counsel further submits that the respondents have issued termination orders, dated 29.12.2014, which are questioned in W.P.No.41318 of 2014. Hence, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 14.10.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.30366/2014 237 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 30366/2014 Dated: 14.10.2025 KAS