Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 52625 (AP)

V.DEVADANA RATNA KUMAR v. JONNAKUTI VASUDEVA RAO

CRLRC/688/2019 · 2025-12-19

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010184122019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 688/2019 Between: 1. V.DEVADANA RATNA KUMAR, GOVERNMENT DOCTOR, GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, AVANIGADDA, AVANIGADDA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. JONNAKUTI VASUDEVA RAO, R/O. MODUMUDI VILLAGE, AVANIGADDA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to call for the entire records of order dt 11-06-2019 in CRL.MP No 596/2019 in C.C No 73/2015 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District and set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner in CC No 73/2015 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge at Avanigadda, Krishna District pending disposal of the above Revision and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B BALA MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 688 OF 2019 ORDER: No representation for the petitioner and respondent No.1. 2. The learned Trial Court vide order dated 14.10.2018 in C.C.No.73 of 2018 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, Krishna District, convicted the petitioner for the charge under Section 138 of N.I.A. Act. 3. In view of such conviction, the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous. 4. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 20.12.2025 CVD