Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4568 of 2022 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. List revised.
2. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate (A.O.R No.A/P1615 of 2022), holding brief of Sri Ajal Krishna, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Ajay Kishore Shukla, learned counsels for the State and perused the record.
3. The present revision has been preferred by the revisionist Ankita Srivastava with the following prayer:-
"It is, therefore, Most Respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit and allow the present Criminal Revision and modify the judgment and order dated 02.09.2022 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghaziabad in Criminal Case No. 621 of 2017 (Ankita Srivastava Vs. Ranjan Srivastava) U/s 125 Cr.P.C. Police Station-Indirapuram, District-Ghaziabad to the extent of award of maintenance of Rs. 1.00 lakh per month as claimed by the Applicant/Revisionist before the Family Court, Ghaziabad which has not considered by the Family Court, Ghaziabad however a meager amount of Rs. 12,000/- per month has been awarded by the Family Court, Ghaziabad to the applicant/revisionist Ankita Srivastava against the opposite party no. 2 regularly from the date of filing the Application i.e. 21.09.2017 the Criminal Case No. 621 of 2017 (Ankita Srivastava Vs. Ranjan Srivastava), or else the applicant/revisionist shall suffer irreparably; and/or may pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present matter has become infructuous since the parties have settled their dispute and present Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ajal Krishna Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ashok Kumar Pandey, G.A. Ankita Srivastava .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
revision be dismissed as infructuous.
5. Prayer is allowed.
6. The present criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
8. Office to communicate this order to trial court concerned within a week for necessary information and follow-up action. September 22, 2025 Gaurav Kuls CRLR No. 4568 of 2022 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad